Where the label reads the assessor's record

Everywhere, the label models a building from national data: a structure inventory and the census tract's year-built distribution. Where a county or state publishes its assessment roll, the label reads what the assessor observed instead — the actual year built, floor area and, in some places, stories, walls, foundation and condition. This page shows where that is true today.

59.3M
homes with an observed record source
41.2%
of all US housing units
27
assessor sources, queried live
311
counties, in 21 states and DC

Share of US homes

Each segment is one source, sized by the housing units in the counties it answers for. Hover a segment for its name.

Counties with an observed record source

Darker means more of the building comes from the record. Hover or tap a county for what its assessor supplies; hover a source in the chart below to find its counties.

Year built, floor area + structure (36.7 million homes)Year built + floor area (19.4 million homes)Year built (3.1 million homes)Modeled only

Every covered county is also listed, by source, under Counties covered.

Homes covered, by source

ACS housing units in each source's counties.

Florida (all 67 counties): 10,256,470 homes (7.13% of US housing)Florida10.3 millionTexas (12 counties: Harris, Dallas, Tarrant, Bexar, Travis, Collin, Denton, Fort Bend, El Paso, Montgomery, Williamson, Cameron): 7,396,724 homes (5.14% of US housing)Texas (12 counties)7.4 millionNew Jersey (all 21 counties): 3,791,354 homes (2.64% of US housing)New Jersey3.8 millionNew York City (five boroughs): 3,678,486 homes (2.56% of US housing)New York City3.7 millionLos Angeles County, California: 3,650,466 homes (2.54% of US housing)Los Angeles County3.7 millionNew York State (33 opt-in counties): 3,154,758 homes (2.19% of US housing)New York State3.2 millionNorth Carolina (46 of 100 counties): 3,149,451 homes (2.19% of US housing)North Carolina3.1 millionMassachusetts (all 14 counties): 3,030,406 homes (2.11% of US housing)Massachusetts3.0 millionMaryland (all 24 jurisdictions): 2,560,784 homes (1.78% of US housing)Maryland2.6 millionCook County, Illinois: 2,276,493 homes (1.58% of US housing)Cook County, IL2.3 millionOhio (9 counties): 2,227,065 homes (1.55% of US housing)Ohio (9 counties)2.2 millionSoutheast Michigan (7 counties, SEMCOG): 2,115,386 homes (1.47% of US housing)Southeast Michigan2.1 millionCalifornia (Riverside, Contra Costa and San Joaquin counties): 1,558,825 homes (1.08% of US housing)Riverside, Contra Costa, San Joaquin1.6 millionConnecticut (all 169 towns): 1,541,822 homes (1.07% of US housing)Connecticut1.5 millionTwin Cities metro, Minnesota (7 counties): 1,334,387 homes (0.93% of US housing)Twin Cities metro1.3 millionUtah (28 of 29 counties): 1,219,388 homes (0.85% of US housing)Utah1.2 millionDenver metro, Colorado (Denver, Jefferson, Adams, Douglas and Boulder counties): 1,098,109 homes (0.76% of US housing)Denver metro1.1 millionGeorgia (Fulton, Clayton, Chatham and Forsyth counties): 852,702 homes (0.59% of US housing)Georgia (4 counties)853,000Portland metro, Oregon (Multnomah, Washington and Clackamas counties): 788,780 homes (0.55% of US housing)Portland metro789,000Pennsylvania (Montgomery, York, Northampton and Cumberland counties): 780,934 homes (0.54% of US housing)Pennsylvania (4 counties)781,000Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: 748,270 homes (0.52% of US housing)Philadelphia748,000Allegheny County, Pennsylvania: 606,827 homes (0.42% of US housing)Allegheny County, PA607,000San Francisco, California: 414,602 homes (0.29% of US housing)San Francisco415,000Washington, DC: 361,014 homes (0.25% of US housing)Washington, DC361,000Jackson County, Missouri (Kansas City): 336,288 homes (0.23% of US housing)Jackson County, MO336,000Virginia (Chesterfield County and the City of Richmond): 260,002 homes (0.18% of US housing)Chesterfield and Richmond, VA260,000Vanderburgh County, Indiana (Evansville): 85,319 homes (0.06% of US housing)Vanderburgh County, IN85,000

How coverage has grown

Homes reachable by an assessor source, by the date each one landed in the label.

0M10M20M30M40M50M60M2026-08-24: +Cook County, IL, Washington, DC — 2.6 million homesAug 242026-08-28: +Florida — 12.9 million homesAug 282026-09-01: +Connecticut — 14.4 million homesSep 12026-10-03: +Texas (12 counties), New York City, Los Angeles County, New York State, North Carolina, Massachusetts, Maryland, Ohio (9 counties), Southeast Michigan, Riverside, Contra Costa, San Joaquin, Utah, Georgia (4 counties), Pennsylvania (4 counties), Philadelphia, Allegheny County, PA, San Francisco — 51.6 million homesOct 32026-10-04: +New Jersey, Twin Cities metro, Denver metro, Portland metro, Jackson County, MO, Chesterfield and Richmond, VA, Vanderburgh County, IN — 59.3 million homesOct 459.3 millionhomes today

What each source supplies

A field is only ever reported when the record unambiguously describes the home being scored — a tower's total floor area is never passed off as one condo's.

SourceYear builtFloor areaStoriesWallFoundationCondition
Florida (all 67 counties)––––
Texas (12 counties: Harris, Dallas, Tarrant, Bexar, Travis, Collin, Denton, Fort Bend, El Paso, Montgomery, Williamson, Cameron)–––
New Jersey (all 21 counties)––––
New York City (five boroughs)––
Los Angeles County, California––––
New York State (33 opt-in counties)––––
North Carolina (46 of 100 counties)–––––
Massachusetts (all 14 counties)–––
Maryland (all 24 jurisdictions)––
Cook County, Illinois
Ohio (9 counties)–
Southeast Michigan (7 counties, SEMCOG)–––
California (Riverside, Contra Costa and San Joaquin counties)–––
Connecticut (all 169 towns)––––
Twin Cities metro, Minnesota (7 counties)––
Utah (28 of 29 counties)––
Denver metro, Colorado (Denver, Jefferson, Adams, Douglas and Boulder counties)––
Georgia (Fulton, Clayton, Chatham and Forsyth counties)–––
Portland metro, Oregon (Multnomah, Washington and Clackamas counties)––––
Pennsylvania (Montgomery, York, Northampton and Cumberland counties)––
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania–
Allegheny County, Pennsylvania
San Francisco, California–––
Washington, DC–
Jackson County, Missouri (Kansas City)–––
Virginia (Chesterfield County and the City of Richmond)––
Vanderburgh County, Indiana (Evansville)––

Does the record make the label more accurate?

Measured where a benchmark exists: homes drawn at random, scored from the address alone, and compared with the assessor's record for that home. Cook County's and DC's references are built from the assessor's tables independently of the adapter; the others are the county's record as the adapter reads it at the parcel itself. Full methodology and caveats.

ModeledWith the assessor record

Year built within ±10 years

0%25%50%75%100%Florida: 63.3% modeled → 88.2% with the assessor record (year built within ±10 years of the assessor's)Florida63%88%Texas (12 counties): 70.0% modeled → 96.8% with the assessor record (year built within ±10 years of the assessor's)Texas (12 counties)70%97%New Jersey: 40.3% modeled → 84.0% with the assessor record (year built within ±10 years of the assessor's)New Jersey40%84%New York City: 29.8% modeled → 98.0% with the assessor record (year built within ±10 years of the assessor's)New York City30%98%Los Angeles County: 52.0% modeled → 96.5% with the assessor record (year built within ±10 years of the assessor's)Los Angeles County52%96%New York State: 39.7% modeled → 80.9% with the assessor record (year built within ±10 years of the assessor's)New York State40%81%North Carolina: 48.1% modeled → 87.0% with the assessor record (year built within ±10 years of the assessor's)North Carolina48%87%Massachusetts: 30.8% modeled → 87.6% with the assessor record (year built within ±10 years of the assessor's)Massachusetts31%88%Maryland: 51.6% modeled → 89.6% with the assessor record (year built within ±10 years of the assessor's)Maryland52%90%Cook County, IL: 39.7% modeled → 87.2% with the assessor record (year built within ±10 years of the assessor's)Cook County, IL40%87%Ohio (9 counties): 51.6% modeled → 93.6% with the assessor record (year built within ±10 years of the assessor's)Ohio (9 counties)52%94%Southeast Michigan: 54.2% modeled → 98.4% with the assessor record (year built within ±10 years of the assessor's)Southeast Michigan54%98%Riverside, Contra Costa, San Joaquin: 64.3% modeled → 97.3% with the assessor record (year built within ±10 years of the assessor's)Riverside, Contra Costa, San Joaquin64%97%Connecticut: 37.5% modeled → 85.1% with the assessor record (year built within ±10 years of the assessor's)Connecticut38%85%Twin Cities metro: 53.7% modeled → 91.1% with the assessor record (year built within ±10 years of the assessor's)Twin Cities metro54%91%Utah: 51.2% modeled → 93.3% with the assessor record (year built within ±10 years of the assessor's)Utah51%93%Denver metro: 62.6% modeled → 95.8% with the assessor record (year built within ±10 years of the assessor's)Denver metro63%96%Georgia (4 counties): 60.8% modeled → 91.8% with the assessor record (year built within ±10 years of the assessor's)Georgia (4 counties)61%92%Portland metro: 39.1% modeled → 96.1% with the assessor record (year built within ±10 years of the assessor's)Portland metro39%96%Pennsylvania (4 counties): 40.6% modeled → 91.1% with the assessor record (year built within ±10 years of the assessor's)Pennsylvania (4 counties)41%91%Philadelphia: 36.5% modeled → 92.9% with the assessor record (year built within ±10 years of the assessor's)Philadelphia36%93%Allegheny County, PA: 40.2% modeled → 93.7% with the assessor record (year built within ±10 years of the assessor's)Allegheny County, PA40%94%San Francisco: 31.0% modeled → 98.9% with the assessor record (year built within ±10 years of the assessor's)San Francisco31%99%Washington, DC: 29.2% modeled → 89.7% with the assessor record (year built within ±10 years of the assessor's)Washington, DC29%90%DC condominiums: 29.4% modeled → 99.5% with the assessor record (year built within ±10 years of the assessor's)DC condominiums29%100%Jackson County, MO: 52.6% modeled → 91.3% with the assessor record (year built within ±10 years of the assessor's)Jackson County, MO53%91%Chesterfield and Richmond, VA: 51.1% modeled → 93.2% with the assessor record (year built within ±10 years of the assessor's)Chesterfield and Richmond, VA51%93%Vanderburgh County, IN: 34.0% modeled → 91.9% with the assessor record (year built within ±10 years of the assessor's)Vanderburgh County, IN34%92%

Building grade a reader sees is wrong

0%25%50%75%100%Florida: 32.5% modeled → 8.9% with the assessor record (building grade differs from the true attributes' grade)Florida32%9%Texas (12 counties): 29.5% modeled → 2.6% with the assessor record (building grade differs from the true attributes' grade)Texas (12 counties)30%3%New Jersey: 43.1% modeled → 15.5% with the assessor record (building grade differs from the true attributes' grade)New Jersey43%16%New York City: 30.3% modeled → 0.5% with the assessor record (building grade differs from the true attributes' grade)New York City30%0%Los Angeles County: 39.3% modeled → 3.5% with the assessor record (building grade differs from the true attributes' grade)Los Angeles County39%4%New York State: 44.3% modeled → 16.8% with the assessor record (building grade differs from the true attributes' grade)New York State44%17%North Carolina: 50.8% modeled → 13.5% with the assessor record (building grade differs from the true attributes' grade)North Carolina51%14%Massachusetts: 38.9% modeled → 8.1% with the assessor record (building grade differs from the true attributes' grade)Massachusetts39%8%Maryland: 53.1% modeled → 12.0% with the assessor record (building grade differs from the true attributes' grade)Maryland53%12%Cook County, IL: 27.9% modeled → 7.1% with the assessor record (building grade differs from the true attributes' grade)Cook County, IL28%7%Ohio (9 counties): 36.2% modeled → 5.3% with the assessor record (building grade differs from the true attributes' grade)Ohio (9 counties)36%5%Southeast Michigan: 27.4% modeled → 1.6% with the assessor record (building grade differs from the true attributes' grade)Southeast Michigan27%2%Riverside, Contra Costa, San Joaquin: 36.3% modeled → 3.3% with the assessor record (building grade differs from the true attributes' grade)Riverside, Contra Costa, San Joaquin36%3%Connecticut: 55.4% modeled → 17.9% with the assessor record (building grade differs from the true attributes' grade)Connecticut55%18%Twin Cities metro: 30.0% modeled → 5.3% with the assessor record (building grade differs from the true attributes' grade)Twin Cities metro30%5%Utah: 47.0% modeled → 8.5% with the assessor record (building grade differs from the true attributes' grade)Utah47%8%Denver metro: 38.9% modeled → 3.2% with the assessor record (building grade differs from the true attributes' grade)Denver metro39%3%Georgia (4 counties): 43.0% modeled → 10.1% with the assessor record (building grade differs from the true attributes' grade)Georgia (4 counties)43%10%Portland metro: 53.1% modeled → 4.5% with the assessor record (building grade differs from the true attributes' grade)Portland metro53%4%Pennsylvania (4 counties): 54.7% modeled → 8.9% with the assessor record (building grade differs from the true attributes' grade)Pennsylvania (4 counties)55%9%Philadelphia: 35.0% modeled → 8.1% with the assessor record (building grade differs from the true attributes' grade)Philadelphia35%8%Allegheny County, PA: 40.7% modeled → 9.5% with the assessor record (building grade differs from the true attributes' grade)Allegheny County, PA41%10%San Francisco: 22.8% modeled → 0.5% with the assessor record (building grade differs from the true attributes' grade)San Francisco23%0%Washington, DC: 56.4% modeled → 8.2% with the assessor record (building grade differs from the true attributes' grade)Washington, DC56%8%Jackson County, MO: 28.1% modeled → 5.1% with the assessor record (building grade differs from the true attributes' grade)Jackson County, MO28%5%Chesterfield and Richmond, VA: 48.4% modeled → 8.9% with the assessor record (building grade differs from the true attributes' grade)Chesterfield and Richmond, VA48%9%Vanderburgh County, IN: 39.6% modeled → 4.6% with the assessor record (building grade differs from the true attributes' grade)Vanderburgh County, IN40%5%

Is the right house found?

The dangerous failure is not a missing record but a neighbor's record shown as yours. Every source is checked end to end: homes drawn at random from the source itself, geocoded exactly as the label does, then looked up. When the address and the parcel do not agree, the label declines to guess and keeps its modeled value.

SourceHomes sampledAnswered with an observed recordWrong parcelHow
Florida (all 67 counties)16964%0measured benchmark
Texas (12 counties: Harris, Dallas, Tarrant, Bexar, Travis, Collin, Denton, Fort Bend, El Paso, Montgomery, Williamson, Cameron)19083%0measured benchmark
New Jersey (all 21 counties)18175%0measured benchmark
New York City (five boroughs)19896%0measured benchmark
Los Angeles County, California17389%0measured benchmark
New York State (33 opt-in counties)13167%0measured benchmark
North Carolina (46 of 100 counties)18572%0measured benchmark
Massachusetts (all 14 counties)18581%0measured benchmark
Maryland (all 24 jurisdictions)19278%0measured benchmark
Cook County, Illinois29777%0measured benchmark
Ohio (9 counties)18884%0measured benchmark
Southeast Michigan (7 counties, SEMCOG)19096%0measured benchmark
California (Riverside, Contra Costa and San Joaquin counties)18290%0measured benchmark
Connecticut (all 169 towns)16870%0measured benchmark
Twin Cities metro, Minnesota (7 counties)19082%0measured benchmark
Utah (28 of 29 counties)16475%0measured benchmark
Denver metro, Colorado (Denver, Jefferson, Adams, Douglas and Boulder counties)19087%0measured benchmark
Georgia (Fulton, Clayton, Chatham and Forsyth counties)15877%0measured benchmark
Portland metro, Oregon (Multnomah, Washington and Clackamas counties)17985%0measured benchmark
Pennsylvania (Montgomery, York, Northampton and Cumberland counties)19276%0measured benchmark
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania19785%0measured benchmark
Allegheny County, Pennsylvania18981%0measured benchmark
San Francisco, California18498%0measured benchmark
Washington, DC19584%0measured benchmark
Jackson County, Missouri (Kansas City)19679%0measured benchmark
Virginia (Chesterfield County and the City of Richmond)19082%0measured benchmark
Vanderburgh County, Indiana (Evansville)19788%0measured benchmark

Counties covered

The map's county detail as a list, with ACS housing units per county.

Florida (all 67 counties) · 67 counties
  • Alachua, FL — 128,000 homes
  • Baker, FL — 10,000 homes
  • Bay, FL — 108,000 homes
  • Bradford, FL — 11,000 homes
  • Brevard, FL — 299,000 homes
  • Broward, FL — 866,000 homes
  • Calhoun, FL — 6,000 homes
  • Charlotte, FL — 119,000 homes
  • Citrus, FL — 85,000 homes
  • Clay, FL — 89,000 homes
  • Collier, FL — 239,000 homes
  • Columbia, FL — 30,000 homes
  • DeSoto, FL — 16,000 homes
  • Dixie, FL — 9,000 homes
  • Duval, FL — 455,000 homes
  • Escambia, FL — 149,000 homes
  • Flagler, FL — 61,000 homes
  • Franklin, FL — 9,000 homes
  • Gadsden, FL — 19,000 homes
  • Gilchrist, FL — 8,000 homes
  • Glades, FL — 7,000 homes
  • Gulf, FL — 9,000 homes
  • Hamilton, FL — 6,000 homes
  • Hardee, FL — 10,000 homes
  • Hendry, FL — 16,000 homes
  • Hernando, FL — 93,000 homes
  • Highlands, FL — 59,000 homes
  • Hillsborough, FL — 631,000 homes
  • Holmes, FL — 9,000 homes
  • Indian River, FL — 86,000 homes
  • Jackson, FL — 20,000 homes
  • Jefferson, FL — 7,000 homes
  • Lafayette, FL — 3,000 homes
  • Lake, FL — 188,000 homes
  • Lee, FL — 441,000 homes
  • Leon, FL — 138,000 homes
  • Levy, FL — 21,000 homes
  • Liberty, FL — 3,000 homes
  • Madison, FL — 8,000 homes
  • Manatee, FL — 221,000 homes
  • Marion, FL — 188,000 homes
  • Martin, FL — 83,000 homes
  • Miami-Dade, FL — 1.1 million homes
  • Monroe, FL — 55,000 homes
  • Nassau, FL — 45,000 homes
  • Okaloosa, FL — 104,000 homes
  • Okeechobee, FL — 19,000 homes
  • Orange, FL — 587,000 homes
  • Osceola, FL — 171,000 homes
  • Palm Beach, FL — 719,000 homes
  • Pasco, FL — 272,000 homes
  • Pinellas, FL — 520,000 homes
  • Polk, FL — 341,000 homes
  • Putnam, FL — 37,000 homes
  • Santa Rosa, FL — 80,000 homes
  • Sarasota, FL — 266,000 homes
  • Seminole, FL — 200,000 homes
  • St. Johns, FL — 134,000 homes
  • St. Lucie, FL — 160,000 homes
  • Sumter, FL — 84,000 homes
  • Suwannee, FL — 19,000 homes
  • Taylor, FL — 11,000 homes
  • Union, FL — 5,000 homes
  • Volusia, FL — 282,000 homes
  • Wakulla, FL — 15,000 homes
  • Walton, FL — 61,000 homes
  • Washington, FL — 11,000 homes
Texas (12 counties: Harris, Dallas, Tarrant, Bexar, Travis, Collin, Denton, Fort Bend, El Paso, Montgomery, Williamson, Cameron) · 12 counties
  • Bexar, TX — 821,000 homes
  • Cameron, TX — 160,000 homes
  • Collin, TX — 437,000 homes
  • Dallas, TX — 1.1 million homes
  • Denton, TX — 377,000 homes
  • El Paso, TX — 324,000 homes
  • Fort Bend, TX — 306,000 homes
  • Harris, TX — 1.9 million homes
  • Montgomery, TX — 266,000 homes
  • Tarrant, TX — 843,000 homes
  • Travis, TX — 618,000 homes
  • Williamson, TX — 263,000 homes
New Jersey (all 21 counties) · 21 counties
  • Atlantic, NJ — 132,000 homes
  • Bergen, NJ — 370,000 homes
  • Burlington, NJ — 186,000 homes
  • Camden, NJ — 214,000 homes
  • Cape May, NJ — 100,000 homes
  • Cumberland, NJ — 57,000 homes
  • Essex, NJ — 337,000 homes
  • Gloucester, NJ — 118,000 homes
  • Hudson, NJ — 321,000 homes
  • Hunterdon, NJ — 52,000 homes
  • Mercer, NJ — 151,000 homes
  • Middlesex, NJ — 318,000 homes
  • Monmouth, NJ — 270,000 homes
  • Morris, NJ — 200,000 homes
  • Ocean, NJ — 296,000 homes
  • Passaic, NJ — 186,000 homes
  • Salem, NJ — 28,000 homes
  • Somerset, NJ — 134,000 homes
  • Sussex, NJ — 63,000 homes
  • Union, NJ — 212,000 homes
  • Warren, NJ — 47,000 homes
New York City (five boroughs) · 5 counties
  • Bronx, NY — 559,000 homes
  • Kings, NY — 1.1 million homes
  • New York, NY — 923,000 homes
  • Queens, NY — 910,000 homes
  • Richmond, NY — 185,000 homes
Los Angeles County, California · 1 county
  • Los Angeles, CA — 3.7 million homes
New York State (33 opt-in counties) · 33 counties
  • Albany, NY — 148,000 homes
  • Broome, NY — 93,000 homes
  • Cayuga, NY — 37,000 homes
  • Chautauqua, NY — 66,000 homes
  • Cortland, NY — 21,000 homes
  • Erie, NY — 441,000 homes
  • Genesee, NY — 26,000 homes
  • Greene, NY — 29,000 homes
  • Hamilton, NY — 8,000 homes
  • Lewis, NY — 16,000 homes
  • Livingston, NY — 27,000 homes
  • Montgomery, NY — 23,000 homes
  • Oneida, NY — 105,000 homes
  • Onondaga, NY — 212,000 homes
  • Ontario, NY — 53,000 homes
  • Orange, NY — 150,000 homes
  • Oswego, NY — 55,000 homes
  • Otsego, NY — 30,000 homes
  • Putnam, NY — 38,000 homes
  • Rensselaer, NY — 75,000 homes
  • Rockland, NY — 109,000 homes
  • Schuyler, NY — 10,000 homes
  • St. Lawrence, NY — 52,000 homes
  • Steuben, NY — 48,000 homes
  • Suffolk, NY — 581,000 homes
  • Sullivan, NY — 50,000 homes
  • Tioga, NY — 22,000 homes
  • Tompkins, NY — 48,000 homes
  • Ulster, NY — 87,000 homes
  • Warren, NY — 40,000 homes
  • Wayne, NY — 43,000 homes
  • Westchester, NY — 394,000 homes
  • Wyoming, NY — 18,000 homes
North Carolina (46 of 100 counties) · 46 counties
  • Alamance, NC — 77,000 homes
  • Avery, NC — 14,000 homes
  • Beaufort, NC — 25,000 homes
  • Brunswick, NC — 99,000 homes
  • Burke, NC — 40,000 homes
  • Carteret, NC — 52,000 homes
  • Catawba, NC — 73,000 homes
  • Columbus, NC — 24,000 homes
  • Cumberland, NC — 144,000 homes
  • Currituck, NC — 17,000 homes
  • Dare, NC — 35,000 homes
  • Duplin, NC — 24,000 homes
  • Gaston, NC — 102,000 homes
  • Graham, NC — 5,000 homes
  • Guilford, NC — 238,000 homes
  • Halifax, NC — 25,000 homes
  • Harnett, NC — 55,000 homes
  • Haywood, NC — 36,000 homes
  • Henderson, NC — 58,000 homes
  • Iredell, NC — 84,000 homes
  • Johnston, NC — 91,000 homes
  • Lee, NC — 27,000 homes
  • Lenoir, NC — 27,000 homes
  • Mecklenburg, NC — 503,000 homes
  • Montgomery, NC — 15,000 homes
  • Moore, NC — 50,000 homes
  • Nash, NC — 44,000 homes
  • Northampton, NC — 11,000 homes
  • Onslow, NC — 87,000 homes
  • Person, NC — 19,000 homes
  • Pitt, NC — 83,000 homes
  • Randolph, NC — 63,000 homes
  • Rockingham, NC — 44,000 homes
  • Sampson, NC — 26,000 homes
  • Stanly, NC — 29,000 homes
  • Transylvania, NC — 19,000 homes
  • Tyrrell, NC — 2,000 homes
  • Union, NC — 89,000 homes
  • Vance, NC — 19,000 homes
  • Wake, NC — 496,000 homes
  • Washington, NC — 6,000 homes
  • Watauga, NC — 33,000 homes
  • Wayne, NC — 54,000 homes
  • Wilkes, NC — 32,000 homes
  • Wilson, NC — 37,000 homes
  • Yadkin, NC — 17,000 homes
Massachusetts (all 14 counties) · 14 counties
  • Barnstable, MA — 166,000 homes
  • Berkshire, MA — 70,000 homes
  • Bristol, MA — 245,000 homes
  • Dukes, MA — 18,000 homes
  • Essex, MA — 330,000 homes
  • Franklin, MA — 35,000 homes
  • Hampden, MA — 198,000 homes
  • Hampshire, MA — 67,000 homes
  • Middlesex, MA — 664,000 homes
  • Nantucket, MA — 13,000 homes
  • Norfolk, MA — 295,000 homes
  • Plymouth, MA — 218,000 homes
  • Suffolk, MA — 357,000 homes
  • Worcester, MA — 355,000 homes
Maryland (all 24 jurisdictions) · 24 counties
  • Allegany, MD — 33,000 homes
  • Anne Arundel, MD — 236,000 homes
  • Baltimore, MD — 295,000 homes
  • Baltimore, MD — 351,000 homes
  • Calvert, MD — 36,000 homes
  • Caroline, MD — 14,000 homes
  • Carroll, MD — 67,000 homes
  • Cecil, MD — 44,000 homes
  • Charles, MD — 64,000 homes
  • Dorchester, MD — 16,000 homes
  • Frederick, MD — 109,000 homes
  • Garrett, MD — 19,000 homes
  • Harford, MD — 105,000 homes
  • Howard, MD — 125,000 homes
  • Kent, MD — 10,000 homes
  • Montgomery, MD — 407,000 homes
  • Prince George's, MD — 366,000 homes
  • Queen Anne's, MD — 22,000 homes
  • Somerset, MD — 11,000 homes
  • St. Mary's, MD — 46,000 homes
  • Talbot, MD — 20,000 homes
  • Washington, MD — 64,000 homes
  • Wicomico, MD — 44,000 homes
  • Worcester, MD — 57,000 homes
Cook County, Illinois · 1 county
  • Cook, IL — 2.3 million homes
Ohio (9 counties) · 9 counties
  • Butler, OH — 155,000 homes
  • Cuyahoga, OH — 615,000 homes
  • Delaware, OH — 86,000 homes
  • Fairfield, OH — 64,000 homes
  • Franklin, OH — 595,000 homes
  • Licking, OH — 73,000 homes
  • Lorain, OH — 137,000 homes
  • Montgomery, OH — 253,000 homes
  • Summit, OH — 248,000 homes
Southeast Michigan (7 counties, SEMCOG) · 7 counties
  • Livingston, MI — 80,000 homes
  • Macomb, MI — 373,000 homes
  • Monroe, MI — 67,000 homes
  • Oakland, MI — 561,000 homes
  • St. Clair, MI — 73,000 homes
  • Washtenaw, MI — 160,000 homes
  • Wayne, MI — 801,000 homes
California (Riverside, Contra Costa and San Joaquin counties) · 3 counties
  • Contra Costa, CA — 429,000 homes
  • Riverside, CA — 869,000 homes
  • San Joaquin, CA — 260,000 homes
Connecticut (all 169 towns) · 9 planning regions
  • Capitol Planning Region, CT — 417,000 homes
  • Greater Bridgeport Planning Region, CT — 126,000 homes
  • Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region, CT — 83,000 homes
  • Naugatuck Valley Planning Region, CT — 193,000 homes
  • Northeastern Connecticut Planning Region, CT — 42,000 homes
  • Northwest Hills Planning Region, CT — 56,000 homes
  • South Central Connecticut Planning Region, CT — 248,000 homes
  • Southeastern Connecticut Planning Region, CT — 126,000 homes
  • Western Connecticut Planning Region, CT — 252,000 homes
Twin Cities metro, Minnesota (7 counties) · 7 counties
  • Anoka, MN — 142,000 homes
  • Carver, MN — 42,000 homes
  • Dakota, MN — 179,000 homes
  • Hennepin, MN — 572,000 homes
  • Ramsey, MN — 234,000 homes
  • Scott, MN — 57,000 homes
  • Washington, MN — 109,000 homes
Utah (28 of 29 counties) · 28 counties
  • Beaver, UT — 3,000 homes
  • Box Elder, UT — 21,000 homes
  • Cache, UT — 47,000 homes
  • Carbon, UT — 10,000 homes
  • Daggett, UT — 1,000 homes
  • Davis, UT — 121,000 homes
  • Duchesne, UT — 9,000 homes
  • Emery, UT — 4,000 homes
  • Garfield, UT — 4,000 homes
  • Grand, UT — 5,000 homes
  • Iron, UT — 24,000 homes
  • Kane, UT — 6,000 homes
  • Millard, UT — 5,000 homes
  • Morgan, UT — 4,000 homes
  • Piute, UT — 1,000 homes
  • Rich, UT — 3,000 homes
  • Salt Lake, UT — 450,000 homes
  • San Juan, UT — 6,000 homes
  • Sanpete, UT — 11,000 homes
  • Sevier, UT — 9,000 homes
  • Summit, UT — 27,000 homes
  • Tooele, UT — 25,000 homes
  • Uintah, UT — 14,000 homes
  • Utah, UT — 211,000 homes
  • Wasatch, UT — 16,000 homes
  • Washington, UT — 82,000 homes
  • Wayne, UT — 2,000 homes
  • Weber, UT — 101,000 homes
Denver metro, Colorado (Denver, Jefferson, Adams, Douglas and Boulder counties) · 5 counties
  • Adams, CO — 196,000 homes
  • Boulder, CO — 145,000 homes
  • Denver, CO — 360,000 homes
  • Douglas, CO — 144,000 homes
  • Jefferson, CO — 254,000 homes
Georgia (Fulton, Clayton, Chatham and Forsyth counties) · 4 counties
  • Chatham, GA — 138,000 homes
  • Clayton, GA — 115,000 homes
  • Forsyth, GA — 93,000 homes
  • Fulton, GA — 507,000 homes
Portland metro, Oregon (Multnomah, Washington and Clackamas counties) · 3 counties
  • Clackamas, OR — 174,000 homes
  • Multnomah, OR — 371,000 homes
  • Washington, OR — 243,000 homes
Pennsylvania (Montgomery, York, Northampton and Cumberland counties) · 4 counties
  • Cumberland, PA — 111,000 homes
  • Montgomery, PA — 350,000 homes
  • Northampton, PA — 129,000 homes
  • York, PA — 190,000 homes
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania · 1 county
  • Philadelphia, PA — 748,000 homes
Allegheny County, Pennsylvania · 1 county
  • Allegheny, PA — 607,000 homes
San Francisco, California · 1 county
  • San Francisco, CA — 415,000 homes
Washington, DC · 1 county
  • District of Columbia, DC — 361,000 homes
Jackson County, Missouri (Kansas City) · 1 county
  • Jackson, MO — 336,000 homes
Virginia (Chesterfield County and the City of Richmond) · 2 counties
  • Chesterfield, VA — 146,000 homes
  • Richmond, VA — 114,000 homes
Vanderburgh County, Indiana (Evansville) · 1 county
  • Vanderburgh, IN — 85,000 homes

What this page does and does not say

Informational purposes only. This label is a modeled estimate built from public data. It is not an inspection, appraisal, survey, or insurance quote, and it is not legal, financial, insurance, engineering, or real estate advice. It describes what the model expects of a home like this one at this location; it cannot tell you the condition, safety, value, or insurability of any particular property. Verify anything you would act on with a qualified professional. Provided as is, without warranty.

Generated from the adapter registry; newest source added 2026-10-04. Regenerate with python scripts/build_coverage.py --write. County boundaries: US Census Bureau cartographic boundary files via us-atlas.